ITS Transit Standards Professional Capacity Building Program
Module 12: Electronic Fare Payment/Advanced Payment Systems: Open Payments
HTML of the PowerPoint Presentation
(Note: This document has been converted from a PowerPoint presentation to 508-compliant HTML. The formatting has been adjusted for 508 compliance, but all the original text content is included, plus additional text descriptions for the images, photos and/or diagrams have been provided below.)
Slide 1:
(Extended Text Description: Welcome - Graphic image of introductory slide. A large dark blue rectangle with a wide, light grid pattern at the top half and bands of dark and lighter blue bands below. There is a white square ITS logo box with words "Standards ITS Training - Transit" in green and blue on the middle left side. The word "Welcome" in white is to the right of the logo. Under the logo box is the logo for the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology.)
Slide 2:
(Extended Text Description: Title slide contain a blurred image of a bus with the text "Module 12 - Electronic Fare Payment / Advanced Payment Systems: Open Payments Acceptance" superimposed on top of that image. The contactless symbol, a graphic showing a card toward four curved lines representing radio waves within an oval, is also superimposed on the bus image along with a stylized image of a credit card. The bus image was provided under permission from the Rogue Valley Transit District (RVTD) in Medford, Oregon. The contactless symbol was provided under license from EMVCo.)
Slide 3:
Instructor
Gary B. Yamamura
Principal Consultant
Three Point Consulting, Inc.
Slide 4:
Learning Objectives
Slide 5:
Learning Objective 1
Slide 6:
Understand the roles and responsibilities of the key stakeholders and their influence on Open Payment implementations
Slide 7:
Open Payments Acceptance
The term Open Payments refers to the acceptance of bank-issued, contactless
Contactless bankcards may be:
Image provided under license from Thinkstock®
Slide 8:
Key Terms and Abbreviations
Image provided under license from Microsoft®
Slide 9:
Stakeholders
(Extended Text Description: This slide, entitled Stakeholders, has a graphic showing an organization chart with nine (9) different colored boxes that represent the stakeholder groups that control and/or support open payments acceptance. The boxes are labeled, from top to bottom, left to right: Card Networks, Issuers, Acquirers, Mobile Payment System Operators, Independent Sales Organizations, Payment Gateways, Merchant (Transit Agency), System Integrator, and Cardholders (Passengers).)
Slide 10:
Card Networks
Roles and Responsibilities
Slide 11:
Issuer
Roles and Responsibilities
Examples
Slide 12:
Acquirer
Roles and Responsibilities
Examples
Slide 13:
ISO
Independent Sales Organization
Roles and Responsibilities
Examples
Slide 14:
Payment Gateway
Roles and Responsibilities
Examples
Slide 15:
Mobile Payment System Operator
Roles and Responsibilities
Examples
Image provided under license from Thinkstock®
Slide 16:
System Integrator
Roles and Responsibilities
Examples
Slide 17:
Merchant (Transit Agency)
Roles and Responsibilities
Examples
Slide 18:
Cardholder
Roles and Responsibilities
Slide 19:
Recognize the difference between standards, specifications and regulations and the importance of these documents in defining, procuring, implementing and maintaining an EFP system with Open Payments acceptance
Slide 20:
Standards
Definition
A document that defines processes, procedures and/or technology for the common and repeated use of a system that has been established by consensus and approved by a recognized organization.
International standards are formally approved and maintained by the International Standards Organization (ISO) and/or the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC).
Key standards
Slide 21:
Specifications
Definition
A detailed description of the performance requirements, dimensions, materials, and interfaces for the development and/or use of a technology or process.
Specifications are typically defined and maintained by the party that offers the technology or process and may be changed at any time.
Key specifications
Slide 22:
Scope of Impact
(Extended Text Description: This figure has a graphic with five square boxes with rounded corners. Those five boxes represent the major components of an Electronic Fare Payment System and are labeled from top to bottom, left to right: Acquirer, Fare Media, Reader, Local Device and Central System. Above, below and to the right of that graphic are colored boxes that identify the international standards, federal regulations, and specifications that are applicable to the acceptance of open payments. Those boxes are labeled, from top to bottom, left to right: EMV, Network Specs, ISO/IEC 8583, Regulation II, ISO/IEC 18092, ISO/IEC 14443, Regulation E, Regulation V, and PCI DSS. There are arrows leading from the second sets of boxes outward to indicate the component(s) that is/are potentially covered by the standard, regulation, or specification.)
Slide 23:
Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS)
Slide 24:
ISO/IEC 14443
Contactless integrated circuit cards -Proximity cards
Slide 25:
ISO/IEC 8583
Financial transaction card originated messages, Interchange message specifications
Slide 26:
ISO/IEC 18092
Information Technology, Telecommunications and Information Exchange between systems, Near Field Communication, Interface, and Protocol (NFCIP-1)
Slide 27:
EMV
Europay MasterCard, Visa Specifications
Slide 28:
Card Network Contactless Card Specifications
Slide 29:
Card Network Operating Rules
Slide 30:
Regulations
In the U.S., various federal regulations impact acceptance of bankcard transactions. These include:
Slide 31:
Regulation E
Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Slide 32:
Regulation II
Debit Card Interchange Fees and Routing
Slide 33:
Regulation V
Fair and Accurate Transactions Act
Slide 34:
Slide 35:
Question
Which of the following is NOT a key stakeholder for an EFPS that accepts Open Payments?
Answer Choices
Slide 36:
Review of Answers
a) Issuer
Incorrect. The issuer provides cards and card accounts for use in an EFPS system that accepts open payments.
b) Card Network
Incorrect. The card network provides a global platform that facilitates open payments.
c) POS Terminal Manufacturer
Correct! Although the POS Terminal Manufacturer may make equipment for open payment processing, this equipment can be supplied by a variety of different providers.
d) Cardholder
Incorrect. The Cardholders carry and use contactless bankcards in an EFPS that accepts open payments.
Slide 37:
Learning Objective 2
Slide 38:
Common Benefits
Eliminates need for passengers to:
Slide 39:
Common Benefits
Reduces agency need for:
Image provided under license from Thinkstock®
Slide 40:
Common Benefits
Transfers responsibilities to card issuer
Slide 41:
Shared Issues
First tap risk
Mitigation strategy:
Slide 42:
Shared Issues
Merchant fees
Mitigation strategy:
Image provided under license from Thinkstock®
Slide 43:
Shared Issues
Minimal security for offline payments
Mitigation strategy:
Image provided under license from Thinkstock®
Slide 44:
Lack of cardholder adoption
Mitigation strategy:
Slide 45:
Shared Issues
Cost of compliance
Mitigation strategy:
Slide 46:
Shared Issues
Few systems in revenue service
Mitigation strategy:
Slide 47:
Shared Issues
Long certification queues
Mitigation strategy:
Slide 48:
Shared Issues
Title VI conflicts
Mitigation strategy:
Slide 49:
Pay as You Go
Open Payments accepted only as Pay As You Go (PAYG) fares
Slide 50:
Pay as You Go
Unique attributes for this method
(Extended Text Description: This slide, entitled Pay as You Go, has a chart with four columns. There are three rows in the table and the headings in the first row are Agency and Passenger. Large plus and minus signs appear to the left of the second and third row, respectively. Inside the cells in the table are green and red circles with text that identify attributes associated with the particular type of system being described. The content of the table is as follows:
Agency | Passenger | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
+ | Less* complex platform | Possible increase in fare revenue | Easy to use | |
- | Maximum* merchant fees | Highest fare paid | Every ride incurs fare |
* When compared to other open payment methods
Slide 51:
PAYG with Fare Capping
Open Payments accepted as PAYG fares with fare capping
Slide 52:
PAYG with Fare Capping
Unique attributes for this method
(Extended Text Description: This slide, entitled PAYG with Fare Capping, has a chart with four columns. There are three rows in the table and the headings in the first row are Agency and Passenger. Large plus and minus signs appear to the left of the second and third row, respectively. Inside the cells in the table are green and red circles with text that identify attributes associated with the particular type of system being described. The content of the table is as follows:
Agency | Passenger | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
+ | Lower merchant fees | Easy to use | Fairest fare (for full fare riders) | |
- | Reduced fare revenue | Added* platform complexity | No special fare program discounts |
* When compared to other Open Payment methods
Slide 53:
PAYG with Account-based System
Open Payments accepted as PAYG fares with option to link bankcards to transit accounts
Slide 54:
PAYG with Account-based System
Unique attributes for this method
(Extended Text Description: This slide, entitled PAYG with Fare Capping, has a chart with four columns. There are three rows in the table and the headings in the first row are Agency and Passenger. Large plus and minus signs appear to the left of the second and third row, respectively. Inside the cells in the table are green and red circles with text that identify attributes associated with the particular type of system being described. The content of the table is as follows:
Agency | Passenger | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
+ | Supports current fare policy | Higher % of riders served** | More choices for discounts and passes | |
- | Highest* platform complexity | Requires network for fare product sales | Account required for discounts | More difficult to use |
*When compared to other Open Payment methods
** If agency-issued cards provided to unbanked
Slide 55:
Comparison
PAYG (Only) | PAYG with Fare Capping | PAYG With Account-based System | |
---|---|---|---|
Complexity | Lowest | Higher | Highest |
Ease of Use | Easy | Easy | Complex |
Fares | No discounts | Fairest | Discounts and passes |
Fees | Highest | Lower | Depends on usage |
Revenue | Higher (maybe) | Reduced | Minimal impact |
Passengers | Banked only* |
* If no agency-issued prepaid debit card or transit benefits prepaid debit card available
Slide 56:
Slide 57:
Question
Which of these Open Payments acceptance methods enables passenger purchase and use of prepaid fare products?
Answer Choices
Slide 58:
Review of Answers
a) Pay as You Go
Incorrect. Using the basic Pay as You Go method, passengers are only able to make full fare payments using their contactless bankcard.
b) Pay as You Go + Fare Capping
Incorrect. Like the basic Pay as You Go method, passengers are only able to make full fare payments using their contactless bankcard. The EFPS tracks these payments and, once a predetermined maximum dollar amount has been reached, all subsequent fares using the same card within a set period of time are waived.
c) Pay as You Go + Account-based
Correct! Using this implementation method, passengers may elect to create a virtual account that is linked to a particular contactless bankcard. The passenger can then add stored value and/or a pass product to that account to pay fares.
Slide 59:
Learning Objective 3
Slide 60:
Understand and Assess the Costs of Merchant Fees
Image provided under license from Thinkstock®
Slide 61:
Understand and Assess the Costs of Merchant Fees
* Excludes Visa Fixed Acquirer Network Fee (FANF). A monthly fee up to $85 assessed for each payment location
Slide 62:
Understand and Assess the Costs of Merchant Fees
Typical Fee Calculation - Credit Card
Fee Type | Fixed | Variable | Fees on $2 fare |
---|---|---|---|
Interchange | $0.0400 | 1.65% | $0.07 |
Assessments | $0.0223 | 0.13% | $0.03 |
Acquirer | $0.0500 | 0.20% | $0.06 |
Total fees: | $0.16 (8.0%) |
Example uses Visa interchange rates as of October 2015, Custom Payment Services (CPS) small ticket, credit
Slide 63:
Understand and Assess the Costs of Merchant Fees
Typical Fee Calculation - Debit Card
Fee Type | Fixed | Variable | Fees on $2 fare |
---|---|---|---|
Interchange | $0.2200 | 0.50% | $0.23 |
Assessments | $0.0223 | 0.13% | $0.03 |
Acquirer | $0.0500 | 0.20% | $0.06 |
Total fees: | $0.32 (16%) |
Example uses Visa interchange rates as of October 2015, CPS small ticket, debit
Slide 64:
Understand and Assess the Costs of Merchant Fees Aggregation
* Excludes Visa FANF. A monthly fee up to $85 assessed for each payment location
Slide 65:
Key Risks
Recognize the key operational risks and best practices for mitigation
Image provided under license from Thinkstock®
Slide 66:
Key Risks
Recognize the key operational risks
Slide 67:
Best Practices
Best practices for mitigation
Slide 68:
Best Practices
Best practices for mitigation
Slide 69:
Best Practices
Best practices for mitigation
Slide 70:
Recognize and Quantify the Benefits
Slide 71:
Recognize and Quantify the Benefits
Slide 72:
Slide 73:
Question
Which of the following is NOT a key risk associated with the implementation of Open Payment Acceptance with an EFPS?
Answer Choices
Slide 74:
Review of Answers
a) Obsolete technology
Correct! Although the potential for technology to be or become obsolete within the expected life of an EFPS is always a concern, this is not a risk specific to open payments acceptance.
b) Operational costs: Standards compliance and merchant fees
Incorrect. The regulations, standard, specifications and fees applicable to open payments acceptance is constantly changing, making the cost associated with these elements a key risk for the agency.
c) Bankcard data breach
Incorrect. The acceptance of open payments may make the agency a target for theft of the bankcard data.
d) Issuer participation
Incorrect. Open payments acceptance is dependent on widespread issuance and promotion of contactless bankcards.
Slide 75:
Slide 76:
Case Study - Utah Transit Authority
Electronic Fare Program
Image and logo used by permission from UTA
Slide 77:
Case Study - Transport for London
Contactless EMV
Image provided under license from Thinkstock®
Slide 78:
Case Study - Chicago Transit Authority
Ventra Card HH
Image provided under license from Thinkstock®
Slide 79:
Module Summary
What We Have Learned
Slide 80:
Thank you for completing this module. Feedback
Please use the Feedback link below to provide us with your thoughts and comments about the value of the training.
Thank you!